Noratrieb/blog
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Noratrieb/blog.git synced 2026-01-14 20:35:02 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

improve noalias explanation

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
nora 2022-07-22 16:04:59 +02:00
parent 72eebec63c
commit ca879318e6
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
content/posts/box-is-a-unique-type.md
View file

@ -86,16 +86,20 @@ define void @takes_box_and_ptr_to_it(i8* noalias %0, i8* %ptr) {
``` ```
See the little attribute on the first parameter called `noalias`? That's what's doing the magic here. See the little attribute on the first parameter called `noalias`? That's what's doing the magic here.
`noalias` is quite complex, but for our case here, it says that no other pointers point to (alias) the same location. `noalias` is an LLVM attribute on pointers that allows for various optimizations. If there are two pointers,
This allows the optimizer to assume that writing to the box pointer doesn't affect the other pointer - they are and at least one of them is `noalias`, there are some restrictions around the two:
not allowed to alias (it's like if they used `restrict` in C). - If one of them writes, they must not point to the same value (alias each other)
- If neither of them writes, they can alias just fine.
Therefore, we also apply `noalias` to `&mut T` and `&T` (if it doesn't contain interior mutability through
`UnsafeCell<T>`, since they uphold these rules.
This might sound familiar to you if you're a viewer of [Jon Gjengset](https://twitter.com/jonhoo)'s content (which I can highly recommend). Jon has made an entire video about this before, since his crate `left-right` This might sound familiar to you if you're a viewer of [Jon Gjengset](https://twitter.com/jonhoo)'s content (which I can highly recommend). Jon has made an entire video about this before, since his crate `left-right`
was affected by this (https://youtu.be/EY7Wi9fV5bk). was affected by this (https://youtu.be/EY7Wi9fV5bk).
If you're looking for _any_ hint that using box emits `noalias`, you have to look no further than the documentation If you're looking for _any_ hint that using box emits `noalias`, you have to look no further than the documentation
for [`std::boxed`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/boxed/index.html#considerations-for-unsafe-code). Well, the nightly or beta docs, because I only added this section very recently. For years, this behaviour was not really documented, and you had to for [`std::boxed`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/boxed/index.html#considerations-for-unsafe-code). Well, the nightly or beta docs, because I only added this section very recently. For years, this behaviour was not really documented, and you had to
belong to the arcane circles of the select few who were aware of it. So lots of code was written thinking that box was "just a RAII pointer" (a pointer that allocates the value in the constructor, and deallocates it in the destructor on drop) for all belong to the arcane circles of the select few who were aware of it. So lots of code was written thinking that box was "just an
RAII pointer" (a pointer that allocates the value in the constructor, and deallocates it in the destructor on drop) for all
pointers are concerned. pointers are concerned.
# Stacked Borrows and Miri # Stacked Borrows and Miri