From 2dbefdfd686483bfd14173e232461b41a6943ccb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Noratrieb <48135649+Noratrieb@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 22:39:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix

---
 blog/content/posts/item-pattern-and-struct-await.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/blog/content/posts/item-pattern-and-struct-await.md b/blog/content/posts/item-pattern-and-struct-await.md
index fd1f4bb..68b91b8 100644
--- a/blog/content/posts/item-pattern-and-struct-await.md
+++ b/blog/content/posts/item-pattern-and-struct-await.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ draft = false
 
 # The Inconsistency Problem
 
-Quite some time ago, I wrote [a blog post about the idea of `struct else`](./item-patterns-and-struct-else.md), which has been widely regarded as one of the most insightful pieces of Rust language design in the last few years[^insightful].
+Quite some time ago, I wrote [a blog post about the idea of `struct else`](../item-patterns-and-struct-else), which has been widely regarded as one of the most insightful pieces of Rust language design in the last few years[^insightful].
 If you have not read it, it's **strongly** recommended to first read it.
 
 But more recently, it has become clear that there are some serious problems around items that cause this to not work properly.